Medicine Delivery System Documentation
This Medicine Delivery System Documentation presents the data gathered Presentation, Analysis and Discussion of Reports, the results of the statistical analysis done and interpretation of findings to determine the perceived Usefulness and perceived Ease of Use of the developed “Online Medicine Delivery System with SMS Notification”.
Users Evaluation Report
The proponents have conducted a survey from different users specifically the online riders and shoppers to evaluate the System using the PSSUQ criteria.
Table 20: User’s Result of Evaluation
System Usefulness | Mean | Verbal Interpretation |
Overall, I am satisfied with how easy it is to use this system. | 4.133 | Very satisfactory |
It was simple to use this system. | 4.267 | Very satisfactory |
I was able to complete the tasks and scenarios quickly using this system. | 4.133 | Very satisfactory |
I felt comfortable using this system. | 4.067 | Very satisfactory |
It was easy to learn to use this system. | 4.467 | Very satisfactory |
I believe I could become productive quickly using this system. | 4.133 | Very satisfactory |
Mean | 4.2 | Very satisfactory |
Information Quality | ||
The system gave error messages that clearly told me how to fix problems. | 4.533 | Very satisfactory |
Whenever I made a mistake using the system, I could recover easily and quickly. | 4.2 | Very satisfactory |
The information (such as online help, on-screen messages, and other documentation) provided with this system was clear. | 4 | Very satisfactory |
It was easy to find the information I needed. | 4.133 | Very satisfactory |
The information was effective in helping me complete the tasks and scenarios. | 4 | Very satisfactory |
The organization of information on the system screens was clear. | 4.333 | Very satisfactory |
Mean | 4.2 | Very satisfactory |
Interface Quality | ||
The interface of this system was pleasant. | 4.333 | Very satisfactory |
I liked using the interface of this system. | 4.4 | Very satisfactory |
This system has all the functions and capabilities I expect it to have. | 4.4 | Very satisfactory |
Overall, I am satisfied with this system. | 4.6 | Very satisfactory |
Mean | 4.433 | Very satisfactory |
Table 20: Shows the result of evaluation from the users.
Table 21: User’s Overall Result of Evaluation
Criteria for evaluation | Mean | Verbal Interpretation |
System Usefulness | 4.2 | Very Satisfactory |
Information Quality | 4.2 | Very Satisfactory |
Interface Quality | 4.433 | Very Satisfactory |
Overall | 4.278 | Very Satisfactory |
Table 21: Shows the overall result of evaluation from the users.
Based on the survey conducted from the users, the systems’ usefulness, Information Quality and Interface Quality are all very satisfactory. Overall, the End-users Evaluation results is very satisfactory with the systems’ functionality.
Expert’s Evaluation Report
The proponents conducted a survey to 5 random I.T experts for the system evaluation using the PSSUQ criteria.
Table 22: Expert’s Survey Result
System Usefulness | Mean | Verbal Interpretation |
Overall, I am satisfied with how easy it is to use this system. | 3.8 | Satisfactory |
It was simple to use this system. | 4.2 | Very satisfactory |
I was able to complete the tasks and scenarios quickly using this system. | 3.2 | Satisfactory |
I felt comfortable using this system. | 3.8 | Satisfactory |
It was easy to learn to use this system. | 4 | Very satisfactory |
I believe I could become productive quickly using this system. | 4.2 | Very Satisfactory |
Mean | 3.8667 | Satisfactory |
Information Quality | ||
The system gave error messages that clearly told me how to fix problems. | 4.2 | Very Satisfactory |
Whenever I made a mistake using the system, I could recover easily and quickly. | 3.8 | Satisfactory |
The information (such as online help, on-screen messages, and other documentation) provided with this system was clear. | 3.4 | Satisfactory |
It was easy to find the information I needed. | 4 | Very Satisfactory |
The information was effective in helping me complete the tasks and scenarios. | 3.8 | Satisfactory |
The organization of information on the system screens was clear. | 4 | Very Satisfactory |
Mean | 3.8667 | Satisfactory |
Interface Quality | ||
The interface of this system was pleasant. | 4.4 | Very Satisfactory |
I liked using the interface of this system. | 4.2 | Very Satisfactory |
This system has all the functions and capabilities I expect it to have. | 3.4 | Satisfactory |
Overall, I am satisfied with this system. | 4 | Very Satisfactory |
Mean | 4 | Very Satisfactory |
Table 22: Shows the result of evaluation from the validators the I.T experts.
Table 23: Expert’s Overall Survey Result
Criteria for evaluation | Mean | Verbal Interpretation |
System Usefulness | 3.8667 | Satisfactory |
Information Quality | 3.8667 | Satisfactory |
Interface Quality | 4.0 | Very Satisfactory |
Overall | 3.9111 | Satisfactory |
Table 23: Shows the overall result of evaluation from validators the I.T experts.
Based on the survey conducted from the experts, the systems’ usefulness and Information Quality was rated satisfactorily while Interface Quality are all very satisfactory. Overall, the End-users Evaluation results is satisfactory with the systems’ functionality.
Related Article
- Online Medicine Delivery System Documentation Chapter 1
- Online Medicine Delivery System Documentation Chapter 2
- Online Delivery Design and Methodology Documentation Chapter 3
- CHMSC Binalbagan IT Freshmen Admission System Thesis Chapter 4
- Automated Basketball Scheduling System Chapter 4 Documentation
- Library Borrowing System Documentation | Chapter IV – Existing System
- CRANE Thesis Chapter 4 | Presentation and Discussion of Result
Inquiries
if you have any questions or suggestions about Online Delivery System Thesis Project , please let’s me know by dropping your comment below.