Boarding House Finder Thesis Documentation Chapter 4
This chapter of Boarding House Finder Thesis Documentation Chapter 4 discusses the evaluation on the surveyed Boarding House owner, tenants, and Experts regarding the characteristics of the developed system Boarding House Finder.
To statistically compute for the results of the survey questionnaire, the Mean statistics was used and the formula in computing the mean is:
Boarding House Finder Thesis Documentation Chapter 4 : Boarding House Owner’s Evaluation Results
ISO Questionnaire Results
Table 20. Functionality characteristics
The table shows the result on the functionality of the developed Boarding House Finder. The five sub-Characteristics were rated “Good”. Overall, the Functionality characteristics of the developed Boarding House Finder was rated by the 5 Boarding House Owner’s “Good” as evidence by a 4.32 overall mean value.
The survey simply suggests that the developed Boarding House Finder has the capability to provide function that will meet the needs of the owner’s when looking and reserve for finding Boarding House around Negros Occidental area.
Table 21. Reliability characteristics
The table shows the result on the reliability of the developed Boarding House Finder. The total sub-mean was 4 interpreted as “Good”.
The survey simply suggests that the developed Boarding House Finder has the capability to provide function that will meet the needs of the owner’s when looking and reserve for finding Boarding House around Negros Occidental area.
Table 22. Usability characteristics
The table shows the result on the usability of the developed Boarding House Finder. The total sub-mean was 4.13 interpreted as “Good”.
The survey simply suggests that the developed Boarding House Finder has the capability to provide function that will meet the needs of the owner’s when looking and reserve for finding Boarding House around Negros Occidental area.
Table 23. Efficiency characteristics
The table shows the result on the efficiency of the developed Boarding House Finder. The total sub-mean was 4.3 interpreted as “Good”.
The survey simply suggests that the developed Boarding House Finder has the capability to provide function that will meet the needs of the owner’s when looking and reserve for finding Boarding House around Negros Occidental area.
Table 24. Maintainability characteristics
The table shows the result on the maintainability of the developed Boarding House Finder. The total sub-mean was 4.2 interpreted as “Good”. The survey simply suggests that the developed Boarding House Finder has the capability to provide function that will meet the needs of the owner’s when looking and reserve for finding Boarding House around Negros Occidental area.
Table 25. Portability characteristics
The table shows the result on the portability of the developed Boarding House Finder. The total sub-mean was 4.5 interpreted as “Good”. The survey simply suggests that the developed Boarding House Finder has the capability to provide function that will meet the needs of the owner’s when looking and reserve for finding Boarding House around Negros Occidental area.
Table 26. Tenant’s Evaluation Results
The table shows the rating on the Functionality, Reliability, Usability, Efficiency, Maintainability and Portability of the developed Boarding House Finder.
The Functionality Characteristics was rated 4.25 interpreted as “Good”, Reliability Characteristics mean value 4.03 interpreted as “Good”, Usability Characteristics mean value 4.26 interpreted as “Good”, Efficiency Characteristics mean value 4.18 interpreted as “Good”, Maintainability Characteristics mean value 4.25 interpreted as “Good”, And Portability Characteristics mean value 4.24 interpreted as “Good”.
The survey simply suggests that the developed Boarding House Finder has the capability to provide function that will meet the needs of the tenant’s when looking and reserve for finding Boarding House around Negros Occidental area.
Boarding House Finder Thesis Documentation Chapter 4 : EXPERT’S EVALUATION RESULTS
In evaluating the developed Boarding House Finder, ISO evaluation 25022 were use. The expert’s evaluation is presented in table 27.
Table 27. Expert’s Evaluation
It was interesting to note that the overall criteria were rated by the expert as “Good”. The Functionality Characteristics mean value 4.25 interpreted as “Good”, Reliability Characteristics mean value 4.03 interpreted as “Good”, Usability Characteristics mean value 4.26 interpreted as “Good”, Efficiency Characteristics mean value 4.18 interpreted as “Good”, Maintainability Characteristics mean value 4.25 interpreted as “Good”, And Portability Characteristics mean value 4.24 interpreted as “Good”.
Simply suggests that the experts who evaluated the Boarding House finder developed for this study finds the app “good” for use by the intending boarders in the negros occidental area.
The evaluation further implies that the application needs the good standard requirements by the experts for an application to be used by the intending boarders in the Negros Occidental Area.
Related Capstone Resources
- Crane Thesis Documentation Chapter 1
- Crane Thesis Documentation Chapter 3 Methodology
- Classroom Management System Thesis Documentation Chapter 5
- Classroom Management System Thesis Documentation Chapter 3
- Classroom Management System Thesis Documentation Chapter 1
- Classroom Management System Thesis Documentation Chapter 2
Inquiries
if you have any questions or suggestions about Boarding House Finder Thesis Documentation Chapter 4, please let’s me know by dropping your comment below.
Capstone chapter writing checklist
Structuring a BSIT capstone chapter correctly saves rework and eases the defense. Follow this checklist for consistent quality across all 5 chapters.
- Draft the outline first. Every section header first, then fill in the content.
- Write the methodology before the introduction. Chapter 3 (methodology) forces you to think through the system; Chapter 1 becomes easier after.
- Include diagrams early. UML diagrams in Chapter 3 clarify what you’re building.
- Cite sources as you write. Do not defer citations. Use Zotero or Mendeley to track sources.
- Get adviser feedback per chapter. Do not write all 5 chapters then ask for review.
- Number figures and tables. Figure 3.1, Table 4.2, etc. Panels reference these numbers.
- Follow the school template exactly. Font, margins, spacing — do not deviate.
Common capstone mistakes to avoid
- Copying without attribution. Panels use Turnitin. Cite everything you did not write yourself.
- Over-scoping the project. A well-executed simple system beats a poorly-executed ambitious one.
- Deferring documentation. Documentation quality is a big part of the grade.
- Skipping user testing. Panels ask about user feedback. Have real data.
- Ignoring adviser feedback. Advisers know what the panel will ask.
Recommended free tools for capstone projects
- draw.io / diagrams.net. UML diagrams for Chapter 3.
- Google Docs. Collaboration + version history + adviser comments.
- Zotero or Mendeley. Reference management + auto-formatted citations.
- GitHub. Version control for the source code (also earns E-E-A-T signal on your CV).
- Grammarly. Language + tone check on the documentation.
- Turnitin. Plagiarism check before submission (some schools provide access).
- ChatGPT or Claude. For outline scaffolding — not for writing the actual content.
Where to get more capstone resources
- Capstone project ideas. Browse itsourcecode.com/topics/fyp/ for 140+ tested capstone concepts.
- Working source code. itsourcecode.com/topics/free-projects/ has 1,000+ downloadable projects.
- UML diagrams. itsourcecode.com/uml/ has 300+ free UML examples for Chapter 3.
- ER diagrams. itsourcecode.com/topics/uml/erd/ for database schemas.
Official references
Frequently asked questions
How many pages should a BSIT capstone chapter be?
Chapter 1 (Introduction) is typically 8-12 pages. Chapter 2 (RRL) is 15-25 pages. Chapter 3 (Methodology and System Design) is 15-30 pages depending on diagram count. Chapter 4 (Results) is 10-20 pages. Chapter 5 (Conclusions) is 5-10 pages. Total: 60-100 pages for the whole capstone.
What order should I write the chapters in?
Recommended order: Chapter 3 first (system design and methodology — most concrete), then Chapter 1 (introduction with the problem statement), then Chapter 2 (RRL to justify Chapter 1), then Chapter 4 (results — after implementation), then Chapter 5 (conclusions). This avoids rewrites and speeds up defense readiness.
What formatting style should I use for the capstone documentation?
Most Philippine BSIT programs require IEEE or APA 7th edition. Confirm with your adviser first. Use Times New Roman 12pt, double-spaced, 1-inch margins, and page numbers. Reference all sources properly and use consistent citation style throughout.
How many references do I need per chapter?
Chapter 1: 5-10 references. Chapter 2 (RRL): 20-40 references. Chapter 3: 10-15 references. Chapter 4-5: minimal, mostly self-referential. Recent sources (last 5 years) are strongly preferred over older ones.
What tools help write the capstone chapters?
Zotero or Mendeley for reference management, Grammarly for language check, Turnitin for plagiarism scan, Google Docs for collaboration with adviser, LaTeX (Overleaf) for advanced formatting, and ChatGPT or Claude for outline scaffolding (not for writing the actual content).
Adrian Mercurio
Full-Stack Developer at PIES IT Solution
Specializes in building complete capstone projects with full documentation. Strong background in PHP/MySQL development and database design. Has personally built and tested over 30 capstone-ready projects with ER diagrams, DFDs, and chapter-by-chapter thesis documentation.
Expertise: PHP, Laravel, Database Design, Capstone Projects, C#, C, C++, Python, AI Projects · View all posts by Adrian Mercurio →